×
Carat vs. Color  Length*  Width*
  ×

(or examine a single gem)
* size in mm (optional)


1 Ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald)

versus image

1 Ct Diamond (Emerald)

Light Yellowish Green
 
White
6.55×4.85 mm 6.68×4.95 mm
Actual size of 1ct Chrysoberyl
Actual size of 1ct Diamond

Settings
x Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Light Yellowish Green 1ct Chrysoberyl on a ring
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
White 1ct Diamond on a ring
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 1ct Chrysoberyl Emerald (6.55×4.85mm, Light Yellowish Green) and 1ct Diamond Emerald (6.68×4.95mm, White) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Chrysoberyl will face-up smaller than Diamond for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (3.7 vs. 3.52 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Diamond of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


1 Ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald) 1 Ct Diamond (Emerald)
6.55×4.85 mm → 29.54 mm² vs. 30.75 mm² ← 6.68×4.95 mm
Face-up size outline
Face-up size outline
1ct Chrysoberyl Emerald (6.55×4.85mm)
1ct Diamond Emerald (6.68×4.95mm)
Difference: 4% (1.21 mm²)
1ct Diamond Emerald (6.68×4.95mm) has approx. 4% more face-up area than 1ct Chrysoberyl Emerald (6.55×4.85mm).


Popular comparisons

more »




comments powered by Disqus

More popular comparisons: