×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a single gem)
* size in mm (optional)

1.5 Ct Zircon (Round)

vs

2 Ct Amethyst (Oval)

white
 
violet
6.51×6.51 mm 10.94×7.29 mm
actual size
Actual size of 1.5ct Zircon   Actual size of 2ct Amethyst
 
Actual size is set for screen Change
Settings
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
White 1.5ct Zircon on a ring
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Violet 2ct Amethyst on a ring
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 1.5ct Zircon Round (6.51×6.51mm, White) and 2ct Amethyst Oval (10.94×7.29mm, Violet) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones and high-end gemstone jewelry, look at:

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Zircon will face-up smaller than Amethyst for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (4.65 vs. 2.65 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Amethyst of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


1.5 Ct Zircon (Round) 2 Ct Amethyst (Oval)
6.51×6.51 mm vs 10.94×7.29 mm
33.29 mm²   65.4 mm²
Face-up size outline
Face-up size outline
1.5ct Zircon Round (6.51×6.51mm)
2ct Amethyst Oval (10.94×7.29mm)
Difference: 96% (32.11 mm²)
2ct Amethyst Oval (10.94×7.29mm) has approx. 96% more face-up area than 1.5ct Zircon Round (6.51×6.51mm).


Popular comparisons:

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a gem, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.