×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a single gem)
* size in mm (optional)

8 Ct Sapphire (Baguette)

vs

2 Ct Diamond (Emerald)

blue
 
white
13.86×9.24 mm 8.42×6.24 mm
actual size
Actual size of 8ct Sapphire   Actual size of 2ct Diamond
 
Actual size is set for screen Change
Settings
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Blue 8ct Sapphire on a ring
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
White 2ct Diamond on a ring
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 8ct Sapphire Baguette (13.86×9.24mm, Blue) and 2ct Diamond Emerald (8.42×6.24mm, White) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones and high-end gemstone jewelry, look at:

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Sapphire will face-up smaller than Diamond for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (4 vs. 3.52 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Diamond of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


8 Ct Sapphire (Baguette) 2 Ct Diamond (Emerald)
13.86×9.24 mm vs 8.42×6.24 mm
128.07 mm²   48.86 mm²
Face-up size outline
Face-up size outline
8ct Sapphire Baguette (13.86×9.24mm)
2ct Diamond Emerald (8.42×6.24mm)
Difference: 162% (79.21 mm²)
8ct Sapphire Baguette (13.86×9.24mm) has approx. 162% more face-up area than 2ct Diamond Emerald (8.42×6.24mm).


Popular comparisons:

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a gem, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.