×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

0.25ct Diamond (Round, 4×4mm, White) vs 1ct Diamond (Round, 6×6mm, White)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 1ct Diamond (6×6mm, round cut) appears 2.3 times larger than 0.25ct Diamond (4×4mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

0.25ct Diamond (round cut)
vs
 1ct Diamond (round cut)
white
 
white
4×4 mm 6×6 mm
actual size
Actual size of 0.25ct Diamond (round cut, 4×4mm, White color)   Actual size of 1ct Diamond (round cut, 6×6mm, White color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
White 0.25ct Diamond (round cut, 4×4mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
White 1ct Diamond (round cut, 6×6mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
 Gold
Skin tone
 Light
Ring diameter
 16.9 mm
Ring width
 3.0 mm
Finger length
 64 mm
Finger coverage
 24% vs 36%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 0.25ct Diamond Round (4×4mm, White) and 1ct Diamond Round (6×6mm, White) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


0.25 Ct Diamond (Round) 1 Ct Diamond (Round)
4×4 mm vs 6×6 mm
12.57 mm²   28.27 mm²
Face-up size outline for 1ct Diamond (6×6mm, round cut)
Face-up size outline for 0.25ct Diamond (4×4mm, round cut)
0.25ct Diamond Round (4×4mm)
1ct Diamond Round (6×6mm)
Difference: 125% (15.7 mm²)
1ct Diamond (Round, 6×6mm) has approx. 125% more face-up area than 0.25ct Diamond (Round, 4×4mm). In other words, it's 2.25x larger.


Popular comparisons: