0.32ct Emerald (Trillion, 6.1×4.3mm, Green) vs 0.68ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald, 5.74×4.07mm, Light Green )
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 0.68ct Chrysoberyl (5.74×4.07mm, emerald cut) appears 34% larger than 0.32ct Emerald (6.1×4.3mm, trillion cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 0.32ct Emerald (trillion cut) |
vs
|
0.68ct Chrysoberyl (emerald cut) |
|
green |
|
|
| 6.1×4.3 mm | 5.74×4.07 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Actual size is set for screen
Change
Settings
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
0.32ct Emerald Trillion (6.1×4.3mm, Green)
and
0.68ct Chrysoberyl Emerald (5.74×4.07mm, Light Green )
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
All things being equal, Chrysoberyl will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given
carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity
(3.7 vs. 2.7 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the
proportions of the cut.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 0.32 Ct Emerald (Trillion) | 0.68 Ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald) | |
| 6.1×4.3 mm | vs | 5.74×4.07 mm |
| 16.26 mm² | 21.73 mm² |
| 0.32ct Emerald Trillion (6.1×4.3mm) | |
| 0.68ct Chrysoberyl Emerald (5.74×4.07mm) | |
| Difference: 34% (5.47 mm²) |
0.68ct Chrysoberyl Emerald (5.74×4.07mm) has approx. 34% more face-up area than 0.32ct Emerald Trillion (6.1×4.3mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 0.32ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.1 x 4.3) vs. 0.68ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald, Yellow, 5.74 x 4.07)
- 0.32ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.1 x 4.3) vs. 0.68ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald, Light Yellowish Green, 5.76 x 4.27)
- 1.7ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 9.56 x 9.56) vs. 0.9ct Sapphire (Round, Blue, 5.77 x 5.77)
- 0.65ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.94 x 6.94) vs. 0.4ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 6.36 x 4.24)
- 1ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 8.01 x 8.01) vs. 1ct Emerald (Emerald, Green, 7.28 x 5.39)
- 5ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 13.7 x 13.7) vs. 5ct Sapphire (Trillion, Blue, 12.02 x 12.02)
- 34ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 25.96 x 25.96) vs. 20ct Diamond (Round, White, 17.64 x 17.64)
- 0.65ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.94 x 6.94) vs. 1.15ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 7.01 x 5.19)
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a gem, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a gem, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.