×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

0.3ct Sapphire (Round, 4×4mm, Blue) vs 0.21ct Emerald (Round, 4×4mm, Green)


Quick summary: Compared gemstones have equal face-up area.

0.3ct Sapphire (round cut)
vs
 0.21ct Emerald (round cut)
blue
 
green
4×4 mm 4×4 mm
actual size
Actual size of 0.3ct Sapphire (round cut, 4×4mm, Blue color)   Actual size of 0.21ct Emerald (round cut, 4×4mm, Green color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Blue 0.3ct Sapphire (round cut, 4×4mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Green 0.21ct Emerald (round cut, 4×4mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
 Gold
Skin tone
 Light
Ring diameter
 16.9 mm
Ring width
 3.0 mm
Finger length
 64 mm
Finger coverage
 24% vs 24%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 0.3ct Sapphire Round (4×4mm, Blue) and 0.21ct Emerald Round (4×4mm, Green) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Sapphire will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (4 vs. 2.72 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


0.3 Ct Sapphire (Round) 0.21 Ct Emerald (Round)
4×4 mm vs 4×4 mm
12.57 mm²   12.57 mm²
Face-up size outline for true size of 4×4mm
0.3ct Sapphire Round (4×4mm)
0.21ct Emerald Round (4×4mm)
Difference: 0% (0 mm²)
0.3ct Sapphire (Round, 4×4mm) and 0.21ct Emerald (Round, 4×4mm) have the same face-up area.


Popular comparisons: