×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

0.3ct Sapphire (Round, 4×4mm, Blue) vs 0.2ct Emerald (Round, 3.99×3.99mm, Green)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 0.3ct Sapphire (4×4mm, round cut) appears 0.6% larger than 0.2ct Emerald (3.99×3.99mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

0.3ct Sapphire (round cut)
vs
0.2ct Emerald (round cut)
blue
 
green
4×4 mm 3.99×3.99 mm
actual size
Actual size of 0.3ct Sapphire (round cut, 4×4mm, Blue color)   Actual size of 0.2ct Emerald (round cut, 3.99×3.99mm, Green color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Blue 0.3ct Sapphire (round cut, 4×4mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Green 0.2ct Emerald (round cut, 3.99×3.99mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
24% vs 24%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 0.3ct Sapphire Round (4×4mm, Blue) and 0.2ct Emerald Round (3.99×3.99mm, Green) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Sapphire will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (4 vs. 2.72 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


0.3 Ct Sapphire (Round) 0.2 Ct Emerald (Round)
4×4 mm vs 3.99×3.99 mm
12.57 mm²   12.5 mm²
Face-up size outline for 0.3ct Sapphire (4×4mm, round cut)
Face-up size outline for 0.2ct Emerald (3.99×3.99mm, round cut)
0.3ct Sapphire Round (4×4mm)
0.2ct Emerald Round (3.99×3.99mm)
Difference: 0.6% (0.07 mm²)
0.3ct Sapphire (Round, 4×4mm) has approx. 0.6% more face-up area than 0.2ct Emerald (Round, 3.99×3.99mm).


Popular comparisons: