0.75ct Emerald (Round, 6.18×6.18mm, Green) vs 0.75ct Apatite (Round, 5.85×5.85mm, Green)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 0.75ct Emerald (6.18×6.18mm, round cut) appears 12% larger than 0.75ct Apatite (5.85×5.85mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 0.75ct Emerald (round cut) |
vs
|
0.75ct Apatite (round cut) |
|
green |
|
|
| 6.18×6.18 mm | 5.85×5.85 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Actual size is set for screen
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
0.75ct Emerald Round (6.18×6.18mm, Green)
and
0.75ct Apatite Round (5.85×5.85mm, Green)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
All things being equal, Apatite will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given
carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity
(3.2 vs. 2.72 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 0.75 Ct Emerald (Round) | 0.75 Ct Apatite (Round) | |
| 6.18×6.18 mm | vs | 5.85×5.85 mm |
| 30 mm² | 26.88 mm² |
| 0.75ct Emerald Round (6.18×6.18mm) | |
| 0.75ct Apatite Round (5.85×5.85mm) | |
| Difference: 12% (3.12 mm²) |
0.75ct Emerald (Round, 6.18×6.18mm) has approx. 12% more face-up area than 0.75ct Apatite (Round, 5.85×5.85mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 0.05ct Emerald (Round, Green, 2.51 x 2.51) vs. 0.4ct Emerald (Round, Green, 5.02 x 5.02)
- 2ct Emerald (Round, Green, 8.59 x 8.59) vs. 2ct Diamond (Round, White, 8.19 x 8.19)
- 0.2ct Emerald (Round, Dark Bluish Green, 3.99 x 3.99) vs. 0.08ct Diamond (Round, White, 2.8 x 2.8)
- 0.5ct Emerald (Round, Dark Green, 5.41 x 5.41) vs. 0.6ct Emerald (Round, Dark Green, 5.75 x 5.75)
- 0.9ct Emerald (Round, Green, 6.58 x 6.58) vs. 1.13ct Emerald (Cushion, Green, 6.64 x 6.64)
- 1ct Emerald (Round, Green, 6.82 x 6.82) vs. 2ct Kunzite (Round, Light Purple, 8.13 x 8.13)
- 0.8ct Emerald (Round, Dark Green, 6 x 6) vs. 0.5ct Emerald (Round, Dark Green, 5 x 5)
- 1ct Emerald (Round, Green, 6.82 x 6.82) vs. 2.6ct Diamond (Round, White, 8.94 x 8.94)
- 0.7ct Emerald (Round, Green, 6.05 x 6.05) vs. 0.16ct Diamond (Round, White, 3.53 x 3.53)