0.8ct Emerald (Trillion, 7.55×6mm, Green) vs 0.9ct Sapphire (Round, 5.77×5.77mm, Blue)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 0.8ct Emerald (7.55×6mm, trillion cut) appears 7% larger than 0.9ct Sapphire (5.77×5.77mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 0.8ct Emerald (trillion cut) |
vs
|
0.9ct Sapphire (round cut) |
|
green |
|
|
| 7.55×6 mm | 5.77×5.77 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Actual size is set for screen
Change
Settings
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
0.8ct Emerald Trillion (7.55×6mm, Green)
and
0.9ct Sapphire Round (5.77×5.77mm, Blue)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
All things being equal, Sapphire will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given
carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity
(4 vs. 2.7 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the
proportions of the cut.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 0.8 Ct Emerald (Trillion) | 0.9 Ct Sapphire (Round) | |
| 7.55×6 mm | vs | 5.77×5.77 mm |
| 28.09 mm² | 26.15 mm² |
| 0.8ct Emerald Trillion (7.55×6mm) | |
| 0.9ct Sapphire Round (5.77×5.77mm) | |
| Difference: 7% (1.94 mm²) |
0.8ct Emerald Trillion (7.55×6mm) has approx. 7% more face-up area than 0.9ct Sapphire Round (5.77×5.77mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 1.7ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 9.56 x 9.56) vs. 0.9ct Sapphire (Round, Blue, 5.77 x 5.77)
- 0.65ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.94 x 6.94) vs. 0.4ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 6.36 x 4.24)
- 0.32ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.1 x 4.3) vs. 0.68ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald, Yellow, 5.74 x 4.07)
- 1ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 8.01 x 8.01) vs. 1ct Emerald (Emerald, Green, 7.28 x 5.39)
- 5ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 13.7 x 13.7) vs. 5ct Sapphire (Trillion, Blue, 12.02 x 12.02)
- 34ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 25.96 x 25.96) vs. 20ct Diamond (Round, White, 17.64 x 17.64)
- 0.65ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.94 x 6.94) vs. 1.15ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 7.01 x 5.19)
- 0.65ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.94 x 6.94) vs. 0.85ct Emerald (Cushion, Green, 6.04 x 6.04)
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a gem, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a gem, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.