0.8ct Ruby (Round, 6×6mm, Red) vs 0.5ct Ruby (Round, 5×5mm, Red)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 0.8ct Ruby (6×6mm, round cut) appears 44% larger than 0.5ct Ruby (5×5mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 0.8ct Ruby (round cut) |
vs
|
0.5ct Ruby (round cut) |
|
red |
|
|
| 6×6 mm | 5×5 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
Actual size is set for screen
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
0.8ct Ruby Round (6×6mm, Red)
and
0.5ct Ruby Round (5×5mm, Red)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring).
It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 0.8 Ct Ruby (Round) | 0.5 Ct Ruby (Round) | |
| 6×6 mm | vs | 5×5 mm |
| 28.27 mm² | 19.63 mm² |
| 0.8ct Ruby Round (6×6mm) | |
| 0.5ct Ruby Round (5×5mm) | |
| Difference: 44% (8.64 mm²) |
0.8ct Ruby (Round, 6×6mm) has approx. 44% more face-up area than 0.5ct Ruby (Round, 5×5mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 0.8ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6 x 6) vs. 15ct Ruby (Round, Red, 14.74 x 14.74)
- 0.8ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6 x 6) vs. 2ct Ruby (Round, Red, 7.53 x 7.53)
- 1ct Ruby (Round, Red, 5.98 x 5.98) vs. 1ct Diamond (Round, White, 6.5 x 6.5)
- 3ct Ruby (Round, Red, 8.62 x 8.62) vs. 5ct Ruby (Round, Red, 10.22 x 10.22)
- 0.5ct Ruby (Round, Red, 4.75 x 4.75) vs. 0.5ct Emerald (Round, Green, 5.41 x 5.41)
- 1ct Ruby (Round, Red, 5.98 x 5.98) vs. 1ct Emerald (Emerald, Green, 7.28 x 5.39)
- 1ct Ruby (Round, Red, 5.98 x 5.98) vs. 1ct Tanzanite (Round, Blue, 6.37 x 6.37)
- 1ct Ruby (Round, Red, 5.98 x 5.98) vs. 1.5ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.84 x 6.84)