1.6ct Ruby (Round, 6.99×6.99mm, Red) vs 1ct Ruby (Round, 6×6mm, Red)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 1.6ct Ruby (6.99×6.99mm, round cut) appears 36% larger than 1ct Ruby (6×6mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 1.6ct Ruby (round cut) |
vs
|
1ct Ruby (round cut) |
|
red |
|
|
| 6.99×6.99 mm | 6×6 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
Actual size is set for screen
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
1.6ct Ruby Round (6.99×6.99mm, Red)
and
1ct Ruby Round (6×6mm, Red)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring).
It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 1.6 Ct Ruby (Round) | 1 Ct Ruby (Round) | |
| 6.99×6.99 mm | vs | 6×6 mm |
| 38.37 mm² | 28.27 mm² |
| 1.6ct Ruby Round (6.99×6.99mm) | |
| 1ct Ruby Round (6×6mm) | |
| Difference: 36% (10.1 mm²) |
1.6ct Ruby (Round, 6.99×6.99mm) has approx. 36% more face-up area than 1ct Ruby (Round, 6×6mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 1.6ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.99 x 6.99) vs. 1.2ct Ruby (Oval, Red, 8.04 x 5.36)
- 1.6ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.99 x 6.99) vs. 3ct Ruby (Round, Red, 8.62 x 8.62)
- 1.6ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.99 x 6.99) vs. 1ct Ruby (Round, Red, 5.98 x 5.98)
- 1.6ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.99 x 6.99) vs. 1ct Ruby (Oval, Red, 8 x 6)
- 1.6ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.99 x 6.99) vs. 1.35ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.61 x 6.61)
- 1.6ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.99 x 6.99) vs. 1.3ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.52 x 6.52)
- 1.6ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.99 x 6.99) vs. 2.5ct Ruby (Round, Red, 8.11 x 8.11)
- 1.6ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.99 x 6.99) vs. 1.02ct Ruby (Round, Red, 6.02 x 6.02)