1.75ct Emerald (Marquise, 13.32×6.66mm, Green) vs 1.75ct Apatite (Marquise, 12.62×6.31mm, Green)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 1.75ct Emerald (13.32×6.66mm, marquise cut) appears 11% larger than 1.75ct Apatite (12.62×6.31mm, marquise cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 1.75ct Emerald (marquise cut) |
vs
|
1.75ct Apatite (marquise cut) |
|
green |
|
|
| 13.32×6.66 mm | 12.62×6.31 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Actual size is set for screen
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
1.75ct Emerald Marquise (13.32×6.66mm, Green)
and
1.75ct Apatite Marquise (12.62×6.31mm, Green)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
All things being equal, Apatite will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given
carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity
(3.2 vs. 2.72 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 1.75 Ct Emerald (Marquise) | 1.75 Ct Apatite (Marquise) | |
| 13.32×6.66 mm | vs | 12.62×6.31 mm |
| 62.98 mm² | 56.54 mm² |
| 1.75ct Emerald Marquise (13.32×6.66mm) | |
| 1.75ct Apatite Marquise (12.62×6.31mm) | |
| Difference: 11% (6.44 mm²) |
1.75ct Emerald (Marquise, 13.32×6.66mm) has approx. 11% more face-up area than 1.75ct Apatite (Marquise, 12.62×6.31mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 0.3ct Emerald (Marquise, Dark Green, 7.54 x 3.77) vs. 0.3ct Diopside (Marquise, Green, 7.04 x 3.52)
- 0.3ct Emerald (Marquise, Dark Green, 7.54 x 3.77) vs. 0.2ct Emerald (Marquise, Dark Green, 6.58 x 3.29)
- 1.5ct Emerald (Marquise, Dark Bluish Green, 12.88 x 6.44) vs. 2ct Emerald (Marquise, Dark Green, 14.18 x 7.09)
- 1ct Emerald (Marquise, Green, 11.26 x 5.63) vs. 1ct Emerald (Pear, Green, 9.46 x 5.7)
- 1.1ct Emerald (Marquise, Green, 14 x 5) vs. 2.7ct Tanzanite (Cushion, Blue, 8.2 x 7.2)
- 0.2ct Emerald (Marquise, Green, 6.58 x 3.29) vs. 0.8ct Emerald (Emerald, Green, 6.76 x 5.01)
- 0.7ct Emerald (Marquise, Green, 10 x 5) vs. 0.06ct Diamond (Marquise, White, 4.06 x 2.03)
- 0.05ct Emerald (Marquise, Green, 4.14 x 2.07) vs. 0.06ct Diamond (Marquise, White, 4.06 x 2.03)
- 0.55ct Emerald (Marquise, Green, 9.22 x 4.61) vs. 0.55ct Ruby (Marquise, Red, 8.08 x 4.04)