1ct Emerald (Oval, 9×7mm, Green) vs 1ct Emerald (Cushion, 6×6mm, Green)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 1ct Emerald (9×7mm, oval cut) appears 59% larger than 1ct Emerald (6×6mm, cushion cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 1ct Emerald (oval cut) |
vs
|
1ct Emerald (cushion cut) |
|
green |
|
|
| 9×7 mm | 6×6 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
Actual size is set for screen
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
1ct Emerald Oval (9×7mm, Green)
and
1ct Emerald Cushion (6×6mm, Green)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring).
It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 1 Ct Emerald (Oval) | 1 Ct Emerald (Cushion) | |
| 9×7 mm | vs | 6×6 mm |
| 51.66 mm² | 32.4 mm² |
| 1ct Emerald Oval (9×7mm) | |
| 1ct Emerald Cushion (6×6mm) | |
| Difference: 59% (19.26 mm²) |
1ct Emerald (Oval, 9×7mm) has approx. 59% more face-up area than 1ct Emerald (Cushion, 6×6mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 9 x 7) vs. 2.1ct Emerald (Emerald, Green, 9.32 x 6.9)
- 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 9 x 7) vs. 1ct Emerald (Emerald, Green, 7 x 5)
- 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 9 x 7) vs. 1ct Emerald (Cushion, Green, 7 x 7)
- 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 9 x 7) vs. 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 8.63 x 5.75)
- 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 9 x 7) vs. 1.5ct Diamond (Round, White, 7.44 x 7.44)
- 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 9 x 7) vs. 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 7.5 x 5.5)
- 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 9 x 7) vs. 1ct Emerald (Emerald, Green, 7.36 x 6.26)
- 1ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 9 x 7) vs. 1ct Emerald (Pear, Green, 9 x 6)