2.4ct Diamond (Emerald, 8.95×6.63mm, White) vs 2.7ct Tanzanite (Cushion, 8.2×7.2mm, Blue)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 2.4ct Diamond (8.95×6.63mm, emerald cut) appears 4% larger than 2.7ct Tanzanite (8.2×7.2mm, cushion cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 2.4ct Diamond (emerald cut) |
vs
|
2.7ct Tanzanite (cushion cut) |
|
white |
|
|
| 8.95×6.63 mm | 8.2×7.2 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Actual size is set for screen
Change
Settings
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
2.4ct Diamond Emerald (8.95×6.63mm, White)
and
2.7ct Tanzanite Cushion (8.2×7.2mm, Blue)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
All things being equal, Diamond will face-up smaller than Tanzanite for a given
carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity
(3.52 vs. 3.3 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Tanzanite of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the
proportions of the cut.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 2.4 Ct Diamond (Emerald) | 2.7 Ct Tanzanite (Cushion) | |
| 8.95×6.63 mm | vs | 8.2×7.2 mm |
| 55.18 mm² | 53.14 mm² |
| 2.4ct Diamond Emerald (8.95×6.63mm) | |
| 2.7ct Tanzanite Cushion (8.2×7.2mm) | |
| Difference: 4% (2.04 mm²) |
2.4ct Diamond Emerald (8.95×6.63mm) has approx. 4% more face-up area than 2.7ct Tanzanite Cushion (8.2×7.2mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 2.4ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 8.95 x 6.63) vs. 3ct Diamond (Oval, White, 11.7 x 7.8)
- 2.4ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 8.95 x 6.63) vs. 2.7ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 9.3 x 6.89)
- 2.4ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 8.95 x 6.63) vs. 2.8ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 9.42 x 6.98)
- 2.4ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 8.95 x 6.63) vs. 2.4ct Sapphire (Emerald, Light Brown, 8.55 x 6.33)
- 2.4ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 8.95 x 6.63) vs. 2.4ct Sapphire (Emerald, Light Brown, 8.44 x 6.15)
- 2.4ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 8.95 x 6.63) vs. 3ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 9.64 x 7.14)
- 2.4ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 8.95 x 6.63) vs. 3.8ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 10.42 x 7.72)
- 2.4ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 8.95 x 6.63) vs. 1.5ct Diamond (Marquise, White, 11.9 x 5.95)
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a gem, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a gem, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.