×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

2.7ct Ruby (Round, 8.32×8.32mm, Red) vs 2ct Ruby (Round, 7.53×7.53mm, Red)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 2.7ct Ruby (8.32×8.32mm, round cut) appears 22% larger than 2ct Ruby (7.53×7.53mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

2.7ct Ruby (round cut)
vs
 2ct Ruby (round cut)
red
 
red
8.32×8.32 mm 7.53×7.53 mm
actual size
Actual size of 2.7ct Ruby (round cut, 8.32×8.32mm, Red color)   Actual size of 2ct Ruby (round cut, 7.53×7.53mm, Red color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Red 2.7ct Ruby (round cut, 8.32×8.32mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Red 2ct Ruby (round cut, 7.53×7.53mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
 Gold
Skin tone
 Light
Ring diameter
 16.9 mm
Ring width
 3.0 mm
Finger length
 64 mm
Finger coverage
 50% vs 45%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 2.7ct Ruby Round (8.32×8.32mm, Red) and 2ct Ruby Round (7.53×7.53mm, Red) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


2.7 Ct Ruby (Round) 2 Ct Ruby (Round)
8.32×8.32 mm vs 7.53×7.53 mm
54.37 mm²   44.53 mm²
Face-up size outline for 2.7ct Ruby (8.32×8.32mm, round cut)
Face-up size outline for 2ct Ruby (7.53×7.53mm, round cut)
2.7ct Ruby Round (8.32×8.32mm)
2ct Ruby Round (7.53×7.53mm)
Difference: 22% (9.84 mm²)
2.7ct Ruby (Round, 8.32×8.32mm) has approx. 22% more face-up area than 2ct Ruby (Round, 7.53×7.53mm).


Popular comparisons: