×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

2ct Diamond (Cushion, 9×6mm, White) vs 3.5ct Diamond (Cushion, 10×7mm, White)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 3.5ct Diamond (10×7mm, cushion cut) appears 30% larger than 2ct Diamond (9×6mm, cushion cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

2ct Diamond (cushion cut)
vs
3.5ct Diamond (cushion cut)
white
 
white
9×6 mm 10×7 mm
actual size
Actual size of 2ct Diamond (cushion cut, 9×6mm, White color)   Actual size of 3.5ct Diamond (cushion cut, 10×7mm, White color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
White 2ct Diamond (cushion cut, 9×6mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
White 3.5ct Diamond (cushion cut, 10×7mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
36% vs 42%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 2ct Diamond Cushion (9×6mm, White) and 3.5ct Diamond Cushion (10×7mm, White) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


2 Ct Diamond (Cushion) 3.5 Ct Diamond (Cushion)
9×6 mm vs 10×7 mm
48.6 mm²   63 mm²
Face-up size outline for 3.5ct Diamond (10×7mm, cushion cut)
Face-up size outline for 2ct Diamond (9×6mm, cushion cut)
2ct Diamond Cushion (9×6mm)
3.5ct Diamond Cushion (10×7mm)
Difference: 30% (14.4 mm²)
3.5ct Diamond (Cushion, 10×7mm) has approx. 30% more face-up area than 2ct Diamond (Cushion, 9×6mm).


Popular comparisons: