×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (Emerald, 8.64×6.4mm, White) vs 9ct Cubic Zirconia (Emerald, 11.84×8.77mm, White)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 9ct Cubic Zirconia (11.84×8.77mm, emerald cut) appears 88% larger than 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (8.64×6.4mm, emerald cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (emerald cut)
vs
9ct Cubic Zirconia (emerald cut)
white
 
white
8.64×6.4 mm 11.84×8.77 mm
actual size
Actual size of 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (emerald cut, 8.64×6.4mm, White color)   Actual size of 9ct Cubic Zirconia (emerald cut, 11.84×8.77mm, White color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
White 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (emerald cut, 8.64×6.4mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
White 9ct Cubic Zirconia (emerald cut, 11.84×8.77mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
38% vs 52%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia Emerald (8.64×6.4mm, White) and 9ct Cubic Zirconia Emerald (11.84×8.77mm, White) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


3.5 Ct Cubic Zirconia (Emerald) 9 Ct Cubic Zirconia (Emerald)
8.64×6.4 mm vs 11.84×8.77 mm
51.43 mm²   96.57 mm²
Face-up size outline for 9ct Cubic Zirconia (11.84×8.77mm, emerald cut)
Face-up size outline for 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (8.64×6.4mm, emerald cut)
3.5ct Cubic Zirconia Emerald (8.64×6.4mm)
9ct Cubic Zirconia Emerald (11.84×8.77mm)
Difference: 88% (45.14 mm²)
9ct Cubic Zirconia (Emerald, 11.84×8.77mm) has approx. 88% more face-up area than 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (Emerald, 8.64×6.4mm).


Popular comparisons: