3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (Trillion, 9.89×9.89mm, White) vs 3.5ct Moissanite (Trillion, 11.93×11.93mm, White)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 3.5ct Moissanite (11.93×11.93mm, trillion cut) appears 46% larger than 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (9.89×9.89mm, trillion cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (trillion cut) |
vs
|
3.5ct Moissanite (trillion cut) |
|
white |
|
|
| 9.89×9.89 mm | 11.93×11.93 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
Actual size is set for screen
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
3.5ct Cubic Zirconia Trillion (9.89×9.89mm, White)
and
3.5ct Moissanite Trillion (11.93×11.93mm, White)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
All things being equal, Cubic Zirconia will face-up smaller than Moissanite for a given
carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity
(5.65 vs. 3.22 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Moissanite of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 3.5 Ct Cubic Zirconia (Trillion) | 3.5 Ct Moissanite (Trillion) | |
| 9.89×9.89 mm | vs | 11.93×11.93 mm |
| 60.64 mm² | 88.24 mm² |
| 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia Trillion (9.89×9.89mm) | |
| 3.5ct Moissanite Trillion (11.93×11.93mm) | |
| Difference: 46% (27.6 mm²) |
3.5ct Moissanite (Trillion, 11.93×11.93mm) has approx. 46% more face-up area than 3.5ct Cubic Zirconia (Trillion, 9.89×9.89mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 3ct Ruby (Emerald, Red, 9 x 7)
- 1.5ct Tourmaline (Round, Light Red, 7.45 x 7.45) vs. 1.5ct Sapphire (Round, Light Blue, 6.84 x 6.84)
- 1ct Kyanite (Oval, Blue, 7.77 x 5.18) vs. 1ct Tanzanite (Oval, Blue, 8.07 x 5.38)
- 1ct Aquamarine (Oval, Light Blue, 8 x 6) vs. 1ct Spinel (Oval, Gray, 8 x 6)
- 1.16ct Diamond (Round, White, 6.82 x 6.85) vs. 1.2ct Diamond (Round, White, 6.82 x 6.86)
- 6ct Morganite (Cushion, Light Red, 12 x 10) vs. 3.5ct Sapphire (Cushion, Blue, 8.49 x 8.49)
- 1ct Alexandrite (Round, Bluish Green, 6.14 x 6.14) vs. 1ct Emerald (Emerald, Yellowish Green, 7.28 x 5.39)
- 1ct Sapphire (Baguette, Blue, 6.93 x 4.62) vs. 1ct Emerald (Emerald, Green, 7.28 x 5.39)
- 1ct Topaz (Round, Blue, 6 x 6) vs. 0.5ct Topaz (Round, Blue, 5 x 5)