3.5ct Diopside (Cushion, 8.96×8.96mm, Green) vs 3.5ct Emerald (Cushion, 9.56×9.56mm, Green)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 3.5ct Emerald (9.56×9.56mm, cushion cut) appears 14% larger than 3.5ct Diopside (8.96×8.96mm, cushion cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 3.5ct Diopside (cushion cut) |
vs
|
3.5ct Emerald (cushion cut) |
|
green |
|
|
| 8.96×8.96 mm | 9.56×9.56 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Actual size is set for screen
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
3.5ct Diopside Cushion (8.96×8.96mm, Green)
and
3.5ct Emerald Cushion (9.56×9.56mm, Green)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
All things being equal, Diopside will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given
carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity
(3.3 vs. 2.72 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 3.5 Ct Diopside (Cushion) | 3.5 Ct Emerald (Cushion) | |
| 8.96×8.96 mm | vs | 9.56×9.56 mm |
| 72.25 mm² | 82.25 mm² |
| 3.5ct Diopside Cushion (8.96×8.96mm) | |
| 3.5ct Emerald Cushion (9.56×9.56mm) | |
| Difference: 14% (10 mm²) |
3.5ct Emerald (Cushion, 9.56×9.56mm) has approx. 14% more face-up area than 3.5ct Diopside (Cushion, 8.96×8.96mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 1ct Diopside (Cushion, Green, 5.96 x 5.96) vs. 2ct Diamond (Round, White, 8.19 x 8.19)
- 1.5ct Diopside (Cushion, Green, 6.82 x 6.82) vs. 2ct Diamond (Round, White, 8.19 x 8.19)
- 2ct Diopside (Cushion, Green, 7.51 x 7.51) vs. 2ct Diamond (Round, White, 8.19 x 8.19)
- 2.5ct Diopside (Cushion, Green, 8.09 x 8.09) vs. 2ct Diamond (Round, White, 8.19 x 8.19)
- 1ct Diopside (Cushion, Green, 5.96 x 5.96) vs. 1ct Diamond (Cushion, White, 5.83 x 5.83)
- 4ct Diopside (Cushion, Green, 9.46 x 9.46) vs. 4ct Emerald (Pear, Green, 15.02 x 9.05)
- 2.7ct Ruby (Pear, Red, 10 x 7) vs. 3ct Ruby (Emerald, Red, 9 x 7)
- 1.5ct Tourmaline (Round, Light Red, 7.45 x 7.45) vs. 1.5ct Sapphire (Round, Light Blue, 6.84 x 6.84)
- 1ct Kyanite (Oval, Blue, 7.77 x 5.18) vs. 1ct Tanzanite (Oval, Blue, 8.07 x 5.38)