×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

3.5ct Topaz (Emerald, 10.11×7.49mm, Blue) vs 8.5ct Zircon (Oval, 14.69×9.79mm, Orange)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 8.5ct Zircon (14.69×9.79mm, oval cut) appears 67% larger than 3.5ct Topaz (10.11×7.49mm, emerald cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

3.5ct Topaz (emerald cut)
vs
8.5ct Zircon (oval cut)
blue
 
orange
10.11×7.49 mm 14.69×9.79 mm
actual size
Actual size of 3.5ct Topaz (emerald cut, 10.11×7.49mm, Blue color)   Actual size of 8.5ct Zircon (oval cut, 14.69×9.79mm, Orange color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Blue 3.5ct Topaz (emerald cut, 10.11×7.49mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Orange 8.5ct Zircon (oval cut, 14.69×9.79mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
45% vs 58%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 3.5ct Topaz Emerald (10.11×7.49mm, Blue) and 8.5ct Zircon Oval (14.69×9.79mm, Orange) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Zircon will face-up smaller than Topaz for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (4.7 vs. 3.53 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Topaz of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


3.5 Ct Topaz (Emerald) 8.5 Ct Zircon (Oval)
10.11×7.49 mm vs 14.69×9.79 mm
70.42 mm²   117.93 mm²
Face-up size outline for 8.5ct Zircon (14.69×9.79mm, oval cut)
Face-up size outline for 3.5ct Topaz (10.11×7.49mm, emerald cut)
3.5ct Topaz Emerald (10.11×7.49mm)
8.5ct Zircon Oval (14.69×9.79mm)
Difference: 67% (47.51 mm²)
8.5ct Zircon (Oval, 14.69×9.79mm) has approx. 67% more face-up area than 3.5ct Topaz (Emerald, 10.11×7.49mm).


Popular comparisons: