×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

4ct Diamond (Radiant, 10×8mm, White) vs 3.5ct Diamond (Radiant, 10×7mm, White)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 4ct Diamond (10×8mm, radiant cut) appears 14% larger than 3.5ct Diamond (10×7mm, radiant cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

4ct Diamond (radiant cut)
vs
3.5ct Diamond (radiant cut)
white
 
white
10×8 mm 10×7 mm
actual size
Actual size of 4ct Diamond (radiant cut, 10×8mm, White color)   Actual size of 3.5ct Diamond (radiant cut, 10×7mm, White color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
White 4ct Diamond (radiant cut, 10×8mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
White 3.5ct Diamond (radiant cut, 10×7mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
48% vs 42%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 4ct Diamond Radiant (10×8mm, White) and 3.5ct Diamond Radiant (10×7mm, White) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


4 Ct Diamond (Radiant) 3.5 Ct Diamond (Radiant)
10×8 mm vs 10×7 mm
76 mm²   66.5 mm²
Face-up size outline for 4ct Diamond (10×8mm, radiant cut)
Face-up size outline for 3.5ct Diamond (10×7mm, radiant cut)
4ct Diamond Radiant (10×8mm)
3.5ct Diamond Radiant (10×7mm)
Difference: 14% (9.5 mm²)
4ct Diamond (Radiant, 10×8mm) has approx. 14% more face-up area than 3.5ct Diamond (Radiant, 10×7mm).


Popular comparisons: