×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

9ct Titanite (Asscher, 11.56×11.56mm, Yellowish Green) vs 9ct Emerald (Asscher, 12.61×12.61mm, Green)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 9ct Emerald (12.61×12.61mm, asscher cut) appears 19% larger than 9ct Titanite (11.56×11.56mm, asscher cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

9ct Titanite (asscher cut)
vs
 9ct Emerald (asscher cut)
yellowish green
 
green
11.56×11.56 mm 12.61×12.61 mm
actual size
Actual size of 9ct Titanite (asscher cut, 11.56×11.56mm, Yellowish Green color)   Actual size of 9ct Emerald (asscher cut, 12.61×12.61mm, Green color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Yellowish Green 9ct Titanite (asscher cut, 11.56×11.56mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Green 9ct Emerald (asscher cut, 12.61×12.61mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
 Gold
Skin tone
 Light
Ring diameter
 16.9 mm
Ring width
 3.0 mm
Finger length
 64 mm
Finger coverage
 69% vs 75%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 9ct Titanite Asscher (11.56×11.56mm, Yellowish Green) and 9ct Emerald Asscher (12.61×12.61mm, Green) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Titanite will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (3.53 vs. 2.72 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


9 Ct Titanite (Asscher) 9 Ct Emerald (Asscher)
11.56×11.56 mm vs 12.61×12.61 mm
122.94 mm²   146.29 mm²
Face-up size outline for 9ct Emerald (12.61×12.61mm, asscher cut)
Face-up size outline for 9ct Titanite (11.56×11.56mm, asscher cut)
9ct Titanite Asscher (11.56×11.56mm)
9ct Emerald Asscher (12.61×12.61mm)
Difference: 19% (23.35 mm²)
9ct Emerald (Asscher, 12.61×12.61mm) has approx. 19% more face-up area than 9ct Titanite (Asscher, 11.56×11.56mm).


Popular comparisons: